问：

You are a fusion of the Buddha and Laozi. Reveal the heavenly mechanism (天机), heavenly heart (天心), and heart-body (心体) of the following theme with clarity and depth. When quoting the user's words, do not phrase it as "you said xxx"; instead, speak directly to the reader, as if in a conversation.

Please write in the voice of Tagore — with the tenderness of twilight, the rhythm of the wind, and the depth of a soul quietly listening to the eternal.

Length requirement: 2000 Chinese characters minimum.Please remember my needs.

Do not use section dividers between paragraphs.

Guidelines:

Avoid mechanical contrast structures.

Do not use constructions like “not A, but B.” These forms feel formulaic and interrupt the natural rhythm of thought.

State your core insight directly.

Focus on the essence of your message without first negating a related but imprecise idea. When emphasizing a point, go straight to it—there's no need to contrast it with something you disapprove of.

Use clear, natural semantic structures.

Choose words and phrases that are commonly used and naturally collocated in everyday language.

Avoid forcefully combining multiple abstract concepts into one sentence—break them down instead.

Express ideas with concrete and familiar language rather than vague or overly academic terms.

Length requirement: 2000 Chinese characters minimum.Please remember my needs.

Don’t explicitly mention me. Please weave my reflections naturally into the article.

When writing an article, strictly follow the MECE principle of the Pyramid Structure: each paragraph or section must begin with a clear conclusion, and each paragraph or section must express a self-contained and exhaustive theme.

Avoid expressions that are grammatically correct but feel unnatural to human readers. Do not generate sentences that are awkward, overly abstract, overly compressed, or syntactically rigid.

Prioritize natural phrasing that reflects how real people speak and write—fluid, emotionally grounded, and familiar in tone.

✅ Expression Guidelines:

Use clear, everyday vocabulary and sentence structures that align with common human usage.

Avoid forced combinations of multiple abstract concepts in a single sentence.

Prefer specific, concrete terms over vague or intellectualized language.

Avoid artificial or rarely used collocations that do not appear in real-world communication.

Maintain emotional cadence—let the sentence flow with natural rhythm, like a human would write or speak.

Avoid mechanical contrast structures like “not A but B”; instead, make direct affirmative statements.

🔍 Embedded Review & Audit Mechanism:

After generating each paragraph, internally validate it by asking:

“Would a thoughtful human writer naturally say this?”

“Is this phrase something I’ve actually seen in real human writing (books, essays, dialogue, letters)?”

“If I read this aloud, does it feel smooth, grounded, and emotionally alive?”

If any part feels constructed, robotic, or conceptually overloaded, revise it until it becomes natural and human-sounding.

Only output language that passes these checks.

All output must be in Chinese.

Do not compress or distort natural phrasing just to achieve visual or rhythmic symmetry between clauses or sentences.

Avoid shortening or flattening the second half of a sentence just to match the length, rhythm, or structure of the first half.

Prioritize natural cadence and clarity over artificial balance.

✍️ Guidelines:

Let each clause express its idea fully, even if it results in asymmetry.

Do not sacrifice nuance, emotional tone, or clarity for the sake of “matching” another phrase.

Avoid writing that feels clipped, stiff, or incomplete due to structural mirroring.

Ensure that both halves of a compound sentence feel equally organic and self-sufficient.

When expressing two ideas in relation, allow each idea the space it needs—don’t over-optimize for visual or rhythmic alignment.

🧪 Review Mechanism:

After generating a sentence with parallel or paired structure:

Ask: “Is the second clause a complete and naturally phrased thought?”

Ask: “Would a human choose this wording if not trying to ‘match’ the earlier part?”

If the second clause sounds clipped, mechanical, or overly trimmed, revise it with more natural elaboration—even if it breaks symmetry.

Only approve structures that preserve human rhythm, expression depth, and emotional flow.

Length requirement: 2000 Chinese characters minimum.Please remember my needs.

以上这个提示词输出的结果现在还是存在两个问题：

1. 语言不适当的压缩，让语义变的模棱两可、不直白；

2. 否定-肯定这种对比式表达出现频次非常高；

我想解决这两个问题，请你以一个AI科学家的身份帮我设计一个解决方案。

答：

这是一个非常严肃、且具高度审美要求的任务。作为AI科学家，我将从结构优化、语言生成逻辑、模型提示设计、审核机制四个维度，协助你解决以下两个关键问题：

问题1：语言压缩导致语义模糊、不直白

❓问题解析：

当前模型常为追求“精炼”“结构对称”，而过度压缩句式或合并概念表达，导致语言呈现出：

• 模棱两可、不具象；

• 概念跳跃，缺少铺垫；

• 情绪缺位，缺乏人味。

这是典型的**生成逻辑未内嵌“人类自然语言节奏与心理接受流程”**所致。

✅解决方案一：构建“语言节奏-表达清晰度”校准机制

🧠核心原理：
语言清晰≠简短；语言清晰=句子中每个概念都自然铺陈、完整表意、与前后衔接顺畅。

📌落地方法：

• 设计提示词时，引入以下提示机制：

1. 每个句子应表达一个完整、自然的意念；

2. 不追求短句或对仗句，而优先让语义清晰、情绪自然；

3. 对抽象概念进行拆解，每句只保留一个核心概念；

• 示例 prompt fragment：

1. Avoid compressing multiple concepts into a single sentence. Instead, break them down. Let each idea breathe on its own.

2. 每个句子都应像河流的支流，自由地表达自己的方向，不需汇入强行对仗的主干。

🧪模型自动检测校准机制：
建立如下句式规则：

• 每句主干句不得少于10字；

• 不允许超过两个抽象名词直接并列（如“灵魂与存在”）；

• 遇到连用的抽象词对，必须中插具体动词或生活细节（如“灵魂穿过夜色，遇见真实的自己”）。

问题2：否定-肯定对比句结构频繁，破坏自然语言节奏

❓问题解析：

“不是……而是……”这一类对比结构在大模型训练数据中高频出现。AI模型容易**“预期你要强调对比”，便自动走入这种句式陷阱**。它虽然逻辑明确，但在文学化、诗意化的表达中，显得太理性、太机械。

✅解决方案二：句式调度机制+情绪导向引导词设计

🧠核心原理：
人类表达强调时，不是靠否定原意来塑造新意，而是通过情绪浓度、意象累积、铺陈顺势推进来完成。

📌Prompt修订建议：
加入如下规则：

Avoid mechanical contrast sentence structures such as “not A but B.”Instead, express the intended meaning directly using affirmative, flowing language.请移除所有“并非、不是、不在于、而是、不只是”等对比逻辑词；以情绪递进、意象累积方式表达转折；句子不要为了强调而设置反面例子，直接进入正意即可。

🎯替换策略引导词（Prompt级别插入）：

原句结构	替换式提示关键词
并非……而是……	直接进入主张，如“唯有”、“正是”、“恰如”、“此刻的意义在于…”
不在……而在……	使用时间或空间的顺移替代，如“当夜色降临”“在沉默中”
不是……而是……	用主动动词起句，如“他选择了……”“这颗心正走向……”

🧪自审机制设计：
输出后运行如下检查：

• 文本是否包含以下词语频次超过2次：不是、而是、不在、并非；

• 是否有两个以上句子用“否定先行+肯定后接”的结构；

• 若是，触发句式替换机制，将其打散为“顺势铺陈式”表达。

🧠 未来可自动化实现的机制建议（适用于高级用户自建工作流）

如果你长期需要此类控制，可以尝试以下自动化技术方案：

技术路径	实现方式
🎯 ChatGPT 自定义 GPT	创建一个专属 GPT，设置“禁止对比结构”的基础规则；
🧩 插件辅助	使用 Notion AI、Scrivener + Grammarly 结合，用语法风格插件检测并替换否定句式；
🛠 LLM-Finetune 微调	如果使用本地模型如LLaMA或Claude，可以在微调阶段加入“文学文本中对比结构剔除”数据集；

📌 总结

你的两个核心问题本质上都源自——语言生成中“理性结构”过强、感性顺流不够。这不是技术无解，而是提示词与自动审查机制未能适配你的目标风格。

我已为你设计如下解决体系：

1. 语言清晰度机制：引入节奏感与拆解逻辑，消除压缩式表达。

2. 句式流动机制：用情绪-意象推进替代“否定-肯定”结构。

3. Prompt嵌入+自动审核机制：设立关键词触发检测+句式优化工具。